Explanatroy Synthesis – Black Hawk War

Talha Baig Dr. Amy Larsen English 1302 UHD March 14, 2013 Explanatory Synthesis The swarthy slope fight of 1832 erosive lurch was an Indian war head word who had a following of couple blow Sauks Indians. coloured gear and his followers fought against the Ameri sewers onward the war of 1832 and were strictly against the expansion of Americans into their territory (Tena 2-3). The Indian war headland was born in Saukenuk and had been living there with his fellow Indians until the Americans came and forced them show up of their land.Since Saukenuk was Black mortarboards hometown, he was determined to hold onto it and was ready to oppose Americans because he saw the Americans as a threat to his culture and land (John 3). His enkindle and disgrace towards the Americans eventually led to the Black Hawk war on with couple of other factors. The unjust pact of 1804 was one of the main factors of the War and it made Black Hawk even more concerned near the Americans and the trea ty also caused well-nigh intertribal rivalries between different Indian tribes but even after that Black Hawk was hoping to avoid a war.It is know that the American soldiers who confronted Black Hawk allegedly fired the world-class shot, which started the Black Hawk war. The United States Government put forth more treaties to obtain the Land from the Indians but the unjust accord of 1804 is known as the main factor that led to the War of 1832. The way the signing of the this accordance took place was very unlawful because most of the Indians who signed it were not in truth main authority holders of the Indian tribes and the signing of the treaty proceeded even though there were many Indians who were not ready to sell their lands over to the Americans (John 1).Some of the Indians did not even fully understood the conditions of the treaty and the worst part of this treaty was that it gave the land of the Saukenuk village over to the Americans, which made Black Hawk furious and sulphurous (Tena 3). Since even Black Hawk, who was a major Indian chief did not have the complete knowledge about the extent of the Treaty, it proves that the Treaty of 1804 was unlawful and unjust. After the Treaty of 1804, Black and other Sauks became extremely bitter and enraged towards the Americans. The Treaty also ended up causing some intertribal rivalries between the indian tribes.Black Hawk and his followers were not free to accept the terms of the treaty of 1804 and wanted to resist the American ways but on the other hand some Indian tribes feared that they would jump no chance against the Americans and did what they were told by the Americans, which became the cause of tension between the Indians (John 2-3). one and only(a) of the leaders who held a different arcdegree of view from Black Hawk was Keokuk, who was also the leader of Sauks indians and he had no intentions of resisting against the Americans ( Jane 4 ).The different point of views of the Indian tribes a nd the intertribal rivalries that the Treaty of 1804 stirred up caused Black vend and his followers to go on a different path, which was to try and decease back to the land where they all originally started from. That land was Illinois and the Americans had begin remission there. Black Hawk and his followers tried several times to recapture their hometown but could not succeed and were attacked by the Americans, which led to the conflict known as the Black Hawk war.The Indian chief with his couple hundred followers decided to resist against the Americans and tried going back to where they started from, with the function of settling there (Jane 4). However, Black Hawk was still hoping to avoid get into a war with the americans but in the end it was inevitable. The Americans always intellection of the native Indians as savages, who killed a lot of Americans in the past. So when Black Hawk and his raft were crossing the Mississippi River, they were attacked by the American sold iers and the Indians ultimately lost (Arnold 1).It is known that the Americans allegedly attacked and fired on the Indians first, which resulted in the Black Hawk war of 1832 and the capture of the Indian Chief Black Hawk by the Americans. The road to the Black Hawk war of 1832 was paved by the unlawful treaty of 1804, which not just enraged Black Hawk but also caused a lot of intertribal rivalries between the Indians and promote more the unjust actions of American soldiers brought upon the downfall of Black Hawk (Tena).One can easily blame the treaty of 1804 for ultimately dividing the indians and for their bitterness towards the United States government, since Black Hawk was just trying to protect the land and the culture of his people (John 3-4). Word Cited Tena L. Helton. What the White Squaws Want from Black Hawk Gendering the FanCelebrity Relationship. The American Indian quarterly 34. 4 (2010) 498-520. learn MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. Arnold Krupat. Pattersons Life Black H awks composition Native American Elegy. American Literary History 22. 3 (2010) 527-552. Project MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. John K. Flanagan. The Treaty of St. Louis and Black Hawks Bitterness. 21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 405. (2001 ) 2553 words. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. Jane Simonsen. descendants of Black Hawk Generations of Identity in Sauk Portraits. American Quarterly 63. 2 (2011) 301-335. Project MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013.