Ronald Schaffers America In The Great War Essay -- Ronald Schaffer Am

Ronald Schaffers the States In The not bad(p) War Ronald Schaffers the States in the Great War gives new insights into World War I. The book gave historical accounts about the fight that other books negated to included. The thesis that Schaffer tries to prove that the Great War was the moolah of the American welfare state and the beginning of big government. America in the Great War was structured in chronological order of the war, from Americas mobilization to the actual fight. What the book did not include is a detail account of the fighting. This was the biggest draw back in a otherwise well thought book. The book begins with the mobilization of the united States industry and man government agency. The premier two chapters dealt with how the Federal brass influence the view of the war in Americas minds. The methods that the Federal Government used varied from propaganda to coercion. The point behind the Federal Governments involvement in propaganda was to rally the coun try to fight the war. The first bar in shaping the peoples mind was to get the beat back and industry to work together. The Federal Government establi put down perpetrations and teams to persuade the minds of the joined States. One of these committees were the Committee on Public Information established in April 13 1917 by order on the President of the United States. The committee was led by George Creel, former social reformer. He had great power in what the United States saw and heard for the next few years. His first order was to manage American minds without directly using propaganda and censorship. Other nations fighting the war practiced wide spread censorship of all war related material. Creel realized that this would not work in the United States, or else he flooded Americans with news. The news released to the public was in such self-aggrandising numbers and in such great detail that Americans could not empathise all of it. The Committee on Public Information also pro duced films. The films were intentional to rally Americans behind the war effort. The films were nothing else but propaganda, but Creel intentional the films to not come across as propaganda. The committee was very prosperous in hiding the accompaniment that they were engaging in propaganda. Many Americans believed in the films and supported the war e... ...overnment helped veterans in such a large scale. The discourse of the shell shock veterans would eventually lead to one of the largest welfare programs, the Veterans administration. In addition Schaffer changed my views about the American home front. I was not apprised about the extent of propaganda involved shaping the thinking in the United States. I did not know that the Federal Government suppressed take issue to the level that it employed. Such use of propaganda and suppression in the United States would be impossible and such a government using that would be called a Fascist government.In conclusion, I liked the boo k due the fact that Schaffer proved his thesis, the Great War gave rise to the American welfare state. I believe that Schaffer proved his thesis with clear and concrete evidence. I enjoyed how Schaffer shed new light on the Great War. Many historical accounts still deal with the actual fighting and not the behind the scenes action that Schaffer writes about. Schaffers account about women and blacks during the war gave new levels. History has forgotten the contributions that these groups gave to the war.