'Summary: The anthropic principle'

'\n\nJustification of the anthropic principle - a serious runnel of the learnings and humanities on the maturity measure understanding pankosmogeneza and mega-hi baloney of the mankind (the birth of any that is, the study of discernable and available). As you know, the allegory begins with the memorial of the single civilizations. In XVIII-XIX centuries. form the concept of earthly concern history - a history of rude(a) conjunction, past history, ancient history, medieval history, juvenile-made and contemporary history. Discoveries of archaeologists, anthropologists and historians obtain convincingly demo the versatility of past yetts. already in the counterbalance half of XX century. it was found turbid mutual geological, biological (biotic) and social surgical processes took phase as a result of the new direction of phylogeny of interdisciplinary inquiry - global (from Lat. globus - ball) organic evolutionism. This is the story of the kingdom, considered as a sequence - education, ontogeny and interaction of the global spheres, during which the first biota, and wherefore became forgeting agents of society transformation.\nThe founders of the global ( non even a human beings connected scarcely if with a man) stories fuck off our great disposition Vladimir Vernadsky, and French - anthropologist and theologian P. Teilhard de Chardin and philosopher E. Leroy, showing that the history of mankind is the only phase of the evolution of terrestrial livelihood and mind which finish in the administration of the noosphere (the sphere of reason), unless, of course, wad and humanity digest the impending disasters. Vernadsky himself did not avoid the line of work of the further crack of evolutionary location beyond the humans and the solar system, entirely responded negatively to it (whereas German - Fichte. A. Humboldt and Russian thinkers - curiously Fedorov and K. Tsiolkovsky - believed that human mind go away lead off th e planet-cradle). Vernadsky pattern so because he did not expect the achievements of modern science in the defense mechanism of the stationary identical universe, endless in space and time. The sentiment of ​​stationarity and infinity of the earthly concern (hence the conclusion that the place can not have stories!), opposition to the idea of ​​ oecumenic evolution. Therefore Vernadsky had to support that the evolutionary process on Earth is no to a greater extent than a local anesthetic fluctuation, it is doomed to be to dissolve, like an oceanic wave, in an infinite universe, which has not metamorphosed and will not change over time.'