Julius Caesar was, probably, a central figure of the last years of papistic commonwealth. He was great(p) orator, politician and general. He always had to be the first and was totally ruthless in pursuit of his goals and ambitions. He was loved by a lot of Romans, especially by lower class, and a lot of people recognized him as a human god. On 15th of March, 44 B.C. he was called to the Theatre of Pompey to discuss the preparations for the war against Parthia, and was killed by a group of 23 senators which pulled out knifes from under their togas stabbed him to death 1 flowing each. But was his death commodity or noxious for smashing of Italy? Without doubts he had done a lot of correct for the democracy by conquering other lands and extending its territory. Perhaps he would be a middling good politician if he wasnt killed so short after he was declared dictator for life, merely he was killed non for being good or bad dictator, plainly just for being a dictator. No t so dour time ago Romans threw out the king, and now they had pretty very much the same situation, only now king was called dictator. Romans were idealistic for their body politic and a lot of them didnt want their country to utter this status.
I dont mystify anything against the Caesar himself, scarcely I progress to to contain with his assassins - the death of Caesar war a right thing. The man himself was a great person, and, probably, he would be a really good dictator, but I dont believe in dictatorship. He would have passed this customs duty to his children and they might not be as good as he was. Jus t one person should not have an absolute pow! er over the lives of thousands... If you want to ticktock a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment